Abstract

This paper reviews and criticizes in depth the empirical literature on foreign entry mode choice providing a motivation to perform a robustness analysis. Through a review of the theoretical approaches behind each study, as well as by comparing the way theoretical constructs are operationalized, this paper is able to pool the different studies that are part of empirical literature in the field of foreign entry mode decisions into different classes, allowing for a comparison of their results. The literature’s main results are then compared within those groups finding inconsistencies in the significance and sign found by different studies for almost every explanatory variable studied in the context of entry mode decisions. An explanation on the reasons behind those inconsistencies is also provided, yielding a strong motivation for pursuing model misspecification checks and robustness analysis. It extends previous reviews on the topic in that it also includes and compares studies focusing on multichotomous foreign entry mode decisions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.