Abstract
The author would like to correct some inaccuracy in formula (6), concerning the contraction of Casimir operators, which is wrong in the stated form. Let g � g� be a nontrivial contraction. Without loss of generality we can suppose that the contraction is given, over some basis, by a transformation of the type [1]
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
