Deterioration of R-Wave Detection in Pathology and Noise: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation.

Abstract

For long-term electrocardiography (ECG) recordings, accurate R-wave detection is essential. Several algorithms have been proposed but not yet compared on large, noisy, or pathological data, since manual ground-truth establishment is impossible on such large data. We apply the simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) method to ECG signals comparing nine R-wave detectors: Pan and Tompkins (1985), Chernenko (2007), Arzeno et al. (2008), Manikandan et al. (2012), Lentini et al. (2013), Sartor et al. (2014), Liu et al. (2014), Arteaga-Falconi et al. (2015), and Khamis et al. (2016). Experiments are performed on the MIT-BIH database, TELE database, PTB database, and 24/7 Holter recordings of 60 multimorbid subjects. Existing approaches on R-wave detection perform excellently on healthy subjects (F-measure above 99% for most methods), but performance drops to a range of F = 90.10% (Khamis et al.) to F = 30.10% (Chernenko) when analyzing the 37 million R-waves of multimorbid subjects. STAPLE improves existing approaches (ΔF = 0.04 for the MIT-BIH database and ΔF = 0.95 for the TELE database) and yields a relative (not absolute) scale to compare algorithms' performances. More robust R-wave detection methods or flexible combinations are required to analyze continuous data captured from pathological subjects or that is recorded with dropouts and noise. STAPLE algorithm has been adopted from image to signal analysis to compare algorithms on large, incomplete, and noisy data without manual ground truth. Existing approaches on R-wave detection weakly perform on such data.