Abstract
Objectives To analyze prospectively whether prostate cancer (CaP) incidence differs between Japanese men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 2.0 to 4.0 ng/mL and those with a PSA level of 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL. Methods Men 79 years old or younger who were referred to our clinic were screened for CaP. Individuals with PSA levels of 2.0 ng/mL or greater were recommended for transrectal prostate biopsy. The prebiopsy clinical characteristics, cancer detection rate, and pathologic findings from the needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimen were compared between the low (2.0 to 4.0 ng/mL) and intermediate (4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL) PSA groups. Results Of 858 patients screened for CaP, 440 with benign findings on digital rectal examination met the criteria, and 274 (62.3%) underwent biopsy. Of those undergoing biopsy, 110 and 123 patients had a low or an intermediate PSA level, respectively. Men in the low PSA group had a higher free/total PSA ratio, smaller prostate volume, and lower PSA density compared with those in the intermediate PSA group. CaP was diagnosed in 26 (23.6%) of 110 in the low and 29 (23.6%) of 123 in the intermediate PSA group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in the pathologic findings of needle biopsy, including Gleason score, number of cores per biopsy, percentage of positive cores, and cancer length in the positive cores. Conclusions No statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of CaP (23.6%) between men with low and intermediate PSA levels in a Japanese population. The diagnostic yield was comparable to that reported for both white and black men.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.