Detection of intrathecal IgG antibody for varicella and measles diagnosis by evaluation and comparison of a commercial IgG chemiluminescent immunoassay with two ELISAs.

Abstract

Analyse alternative methods of intrathecal antibody detection by comparing chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques to determine if CLIA can replace ELISA in the diagnosis of CNS infections. A panel of 280 paired samples-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum-with known antibody reactivities (Varicella, n = 60; Measles, n = 120) and negative samples (n = 100) were used to evaluate the performance of six serological test kits (Enzygnost, VirClia®, and Serion ELISA (Measles and Variella). For Measles virus IgG, the VirClia® IgG monotest revealed 97% and 94% positive and negative agreement to the Enzygnost as reference test,respectively. In contrast, Serion ELISA kits yielded values of 18% and 90%. For theVaricella Zoster virus (VZV) IgG, the VirClia® IgG monotest showed 97% and 90% positive and negative agreement compared to Enzygnost. The Serion ELISA kits showed values of 55% and 86%, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that the areas under the curve for Measles and VZV IgGs were 0.7 and 0.852, respectively, using the Serion kit, and 0.963 and 0.955, for Vircell S.L CLIA technique. VirClia® monotest values were calculated using an antibody index cut-off of 1.3. The findings indicate that CLIA testing can improve antibody detection in CSF samples, aiding the diagnosis of infectious neurological impairments.