Detection of inflammation using cardiac positron emission tomography for evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias: An institutional experience

Abstract

The use of cardiac positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) is increasingly used for the detection of underlying inflammation in patients with ventricular arrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]), but the role of PET-CT remains undefined, particularly for patients who do not meet Task Force criteria for sarcoidosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of PET-CT for clinical evaluation of VT/VF in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Consecutive patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and VT/VF who underwent cardiac PET-CT to detect inflammation between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed for baseline demographic characteristics, imaging results, and outcomes. Patients with known sarcoidosis or other conditions requiring immunosuppressive therapy were excluded. PET-CT was performed in 133 patients with mean age 56.3 ± 13.5 years and left ventricular ejection fraction 43% ± 16.1%, with evidence of myocardial inflammation detected in 32 (23.5%). Patients with myocardial inflammation were managed conservatively with medical therapy including immunosuppressive agents. Ten patients with myocardial inflammation ultimately required catheter ablation for ongoing arrhythmias. There was no significant difference in arrhythmia recurrence between PET-positive and PET-negative groups (37.5% vs 32.4%; P = .43) or in time to recurrence (P = .26), in spite of the disparate management strategies. Gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 96 patients (72%); however, magnetic resonance imaging did not detect 31% of cases with active inflammation that were otherwise detected on PET-CT. The use of PET-CT significantly improves the detection of underlying myocardial inflammation contributing to ventricular arrhythmias. Management of these patients with immunosuppressive medical therapy is effective for arrhythmia control and may obviate the need for invasive ablation procedures in some patients.