Abstract

IN recent years fluorescence microscopy has proved useful in bacterial identification and other clinical diagnostic procedures including the fluorescent antibody technique. Various fluorochromes have also been used in identifying soil bacteria1 or distinguishing them from soil humus2. Richards and Miller3 and Richards et al.4 reported that staining the tubercle organism with auramine O markedly enhanced its visualization, made possible the observation of large fields at low magnification, and thus increased the possibility of obtaining positive diagnoses. Some of these uses and others have been reviewed by Perner5. During examination of foliar penetration and movement of fluorescent dyes by fluorescence microscopy6–12 we observed that pollen grains entangled in the trichomes of Prosopis juliflora (mesquite) fluoresced brilliantly. The use of acridine orange in enhancing morphological detail of fresh pollen grains was afterwards described by Ratcliffe et al.13. The question at once arose as to whether fossil pollen in soil and sediment samples would respond in the same fashion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.