Abstract

The diagnostic utility of different noninvasive electrode placements for deriving the electroencephalogram and detecting interictal epileptiform discharges was compared. Anterior temporal and nasopharyngeal electrodes in combination with routine scalp electrodes detected over 97% of the spikes, whereas recording from only standard electrode placements detected 58%. Minisphenoidal and surface sphenoidal electrodes were generally not helpful. In some circumstances, however, the use of surface sphenoidal electrodes provided important confirmatory information. In no case did the minisphenoidal electrodes provide unique information, and their use seems unjustified, although the inclusion of other nonstandard electrodes in the recording montage is important to increase the yield.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.