Abstract
Summary Lactometric and cryoscopic methods were studied relative to the adaptability and accuracy (of the lactometric procedures) for the determination of water added to milk. The limiting formula: % added water= SS 1 − SS 2 SS 1 .100 was used in conjunction with the lactometric methods. SS 1 was calculated from the Babcock fat test by the Jacobson regression equation: SS 1 = 0.4F + 7.07; SS 2 was evaluated by the lactometric method for the sample under observation. The seven common lactometric procedures employed yielded results that were low; the variations from the percentages of water actually added increased in non-linear fashion as the percentage of water added increased. The modified Herrington formula, used with milk samples which were heated to 45° C, cooled to 30° C. and read at that temperature, yielded results that were slightly high for normal milk and decreased linearly as the percentage added water increased. This variation resulted from the fact that the fat percentage from which SS 1 was calculated was low in the watered milk. As a result, the limiting formula was modified to yield the following formula: % added H 2 0 = 110.89 − 111.11. SS 2 SS 1 which gave fairly satisfactory results when used in conjunction with the modified Herrington formula for the determination of SS 2 . With this procedure, 32 of 33 watered (4 to 15%) samples were diagnosed as watersed, the 33rd as suspected as watered, five of nine skimmed samples were designated skimmed or suspected as skimmed, two as normal and two as suspected as watered, and of six normal samples, four were designated as normal, one as suspected as skimmed and one as suspected as watered. It is considered, therefore, that the procedure would serve well, for the milk supply studied, as a sorting method, that samples designated as having 5 per cent or more added water, would be watered 95 in 100 times and that the results are sufficiently promising to warrant other investigators checking the method in other milk sheds. The Elsdon and Stubbs formula, for calculating added water from the freezing point depression of the milk, was found superior to that of the A.O.A.C. when the value 0.550° C. was employed as the average freezing point depression of milk. The data obtained indicate that the method will detect 3 percent added water at the 99 percent probability level and 2 percent at the 95 percent probability level.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.