Abstract
Burn and wound infe?tion is ?ne of the m?st frequent s?ri?us sicknesses c?used by pathogen, chiefly b? b?th gr?m p?sitive ?nd gr?m neg?tive b?cteri?.This study was carried out to identify 25 bacteria isolated from burns and wounds surgical belong to the species : (Staphylococcus aureus,Staphylococcus lentus ,Staphylococcus intermedius,Staphylococcus lugdunensis,Pseudomonas aeruginosa ,Pseudomonas oryzihabitans,Pantoea spp., E.coli ,Rhizobium radiobacter,Ochrobactrum anthropic,Burkholdria cepacia,Sphingomonas pauci- mobilis,Klebsiella pneumoniae,Aeromonas sobria.. Staphylococcus 9(36%) was the most dominant organism,followed by Pseudomonas 6(24%).Antibacterial activity of some antibiotics was investigated against bacterial isolates . the data demonstrate the most commoly isolated from burns and wounds surgical were Staphylococcus followed by Pseudomonas .All b?ct?rial is?l?tes revealed high r?sist?nce t? antibiotics were us?d, Whereas Staphylococcus aureus revealed resistance for three antibiotic: Amikacin ,Nitazo- xanide,Neomycin . Pseudomonas aeruginosa revealed resistance for four antibiotic: Neomycin,Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid, Cepha- lothin ,Cefotaxime. Pantoea spp revealed resistance for five antibiotic: Neomycin,Trimethoprime,Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid, Cephalothin ,Cefotaxime . E.coli revealed resistance for four antibiotic: Neomycin ,Trimethoprime,Amikacin,Cephalothin.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.