Detection and surveillance of circulating tumor cells in sarcoma for predicting therapy response and prognosis.

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

e23573 Background: Generally sarcomas are categorized as soft tissue and bone sarcomas and represent heterogenous group of malignancies with more than 70 distinct histologic subtypes. Due to their rarity and heterogeneity, sarcomas present particular challenges for accurate diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. The presence and persistence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the peripheral blood are believed to be associated with poor prognosis and distant metastases. A blood-based CTCs test is thus greatly needed for monitoring disease progression and predicting clinical outcomes. Methods: In this study, we developed a CTCs test for the detection and surveillance of sarcoma patients’ CTCs, and subsequently explored its clinical value. 123 patients with sarcomas were enrolled as the cohort for serial CTCs tests. Dynamic CTCs counting, in combination with therapy evaluation and post-treatment follow-up, was used to explore predicting pre- and post-chemotherapy evaluation and prognosis. Results: Quantification of CTCs demonstrated a significant increase in sarcoma patients compared to healthy individuals. Furthermore, patients in stage III-IV had a higher CTC count than those in stage I-II (p<0.01), suggesting a correlation between CTCs and disease development. Remarkably, there was variation in the quantity of CTCs among different types of sarcomas. The highest number of CTCs was observed in undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma, followed by soft tissue tumor, while bone tumors had the lowest number. In addition, the number of CTCs in patients with positive PD-L1 expression was considerably greater than in those with negative expression (p<0.01). The count of CTCs shown a substantial decrease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment. There was a decline in the number of CTCs both before and after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, however, there was no significant statistical discrepancy. The number of CTCs at the baseline was shown to be considerably larger in the group of patients with progressive disease or stable disease (PD+SD) compared to the group with partial response or complete response (PR+CR) (p<0.05). This difference was particularly pronounced for interstitial-type CTCs (p<0.01). Conclusions: The rate of presence of CTCs in the peripheral blood of sarcoma patients is high, and patients with an increased percentage of CTCs after treatment have a poor treatment effect. The dynamic monitoring of changes in CTCs counts after treatment has clinical significance for the timely detection of recurrence or metastasis. CTCs also showed a clinical value in prediction of therapy efficiency or prognosis, and may be clinically valuable for the whole course management of patients.