Abstract

Long-lived simultaneous changes in the autodependency of dynamic system variables characterize crucial events as epileptic seizures and volcanic eruptions and are expected to precede psychiatric conditions. To understand and predict such phenomena, methods are needed that detect such changes in multivariate time series. We put forward two methods: First, we propose KCP-AR, a novel adaptation of the general-purpose KCP (Kernel Change Point) method. Whereas KCP is implemented on the raw data and does not shed light on which parameter changed, KCP-AR is applied to the running autocorrelations, allowing to focus on changes in this parameter. Second, we revisit the regime switching AR(1) approach and propose to fit models wherein only the parameters capturing autodependency differ across the regimes. We perform a simulation study comparing both methods: KCP-AR outperforms regime switching AR(1) when variables are uncorrelated, while the latter is more reliable when multicolinearity is severe. Regime switching AR(1), however, may yield recurrent switches even when the change is long-lived. We discuss an application to psychopathology data where we investigate whether emotional inertia -the autodependency of affective states- changes before a relapse into depression.

Highlights

  • The methods differ in how easy it is to infer the location of the change point marking the long-lived change(s)

  • We have shown that regime switching AR(1) and KCP-AR can detect abrupt autocorrelation changes

  • Our simulation results revealed that detection performance is influenced by the magnitude of the autocorrelation change, the number of change points, the number of noise variables, collinearity of the variables and the phase size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The methods differ in how easy it is to infer the location of the change point marking the long-lived change(s). For KCP-AR, on the other hand, auxiliary analysis is needed to compute and compare the autocorrelations per phase. This is reasonable since change point detection methods segment the series into phases with distinct parameter levels as in a piecewise constant function[24,40,41]. Regime switching AR(1) considers all time points, while the estimates for KCP-AR are always computed within a phase. If the regime switching method yields many short-lived switches rather than regimes that are clearly separated in time, it makes sense to look at the autocorrelations based on the KCP-AR change point

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.