Abstract
Whether there are ecological limits to species diversification is a hotly debated topic. Molecular phylogenies show slowdowns in lineage accumulation, suggesting that speciation rates decline with increasing diversity. A maximum‐likelihood (ML) method to detect diversity‐dependent (DD) diversification from phylogenetic branching times exists, but it assumes that diversity‐dependence is a global phenomenon and therefore ignores that the underlying species interactions are mostly local, and not all species in the phylogeny co‐occur locally. Here, we explore whether this ML method based on the nonspatial diversity‐dependence model can detect local diversity‐dependence, by applying it to phylogenies, simulated with a spatial stochastic model of local DD speciation, extinction, and dispersal between two local communities. We find that type I errors (falsely detecting diversity‐dependence) are low, and the power to detect diversity‐dependence is high when dispersal rates are not too low. Interestingly, when dispersal is high the power to detect diversity‐dependence is even higher than in the nonspatial model. Moreover, estimates of intrinsic speciation rate, extinction rate, and ecological limit strongly depend on dispersal rate. We conclude that the nonspatial DD approach can be used to detect diversity‐dependence in clades of species that live in not too disconnected areas, but parameter estimates must be interpreted cautiously.
Highlights
The STT plots that we show here are for a single location because in our model the diversity-dependence is defined as local dynamics
To test the model behavior under high species dispersal rate, we explored an extreme case in which dispersal rate is extremely large (M0 = 1000)
Methods to estimate model parameters from phylogenetic trees exist (Etienne et al 2011; Etienne and Haegeman 2012) but have not yet fully addressed the question: if diversity-dependence is operating, can it be reliably detected? Etienne et al (2016) looked at simulations with the nonspatial DD model and studied when the presence or absence of diversity-dependence can be detected using the likelihood derived for this nonspatial model
Summary
The rising availability of molecular data to create phylogenies has motivated the development of a variety of methods to interpret lineage diversification and better understand its mechanisms Such methods include the lineages-through-time (LTT) plot—a semilogarithmic plot that tracks the number of species that have descendants at the present through time. LTT plots indicate that species accumulation slows through evolutionary time (Moen and Morlon 2014) This decreasing rate of diversification has often been interpreted as a sign of diversity-dependence (Pybus and Harvey 2000; Weir 2006; Phillimore and Price 2008; Rabosky and Lovette 2008a, 2008b), resulting in the absence of a correlation between the crown age of phylogenies and current-day diversity. Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.