Abstract
Engles ARCH test has become the standard test for ARCH effects in applied work. Under non-normality the true rejection probability of this test can differ substantially from the nominal level, however. Bootstrap and Monte Carlo versions of the test may then be used instead. This paper proposes an alternative test procedure. The new test exploits the empirical distribution of the data and an extended probability integral transformation. The test is compared with the former tests in Monte Carlo experiments. Under normality, the new test works as well as the conventional Monte Carlo test and the bootstrap. Under non-normality, the test tends to be more accurate and more powerful than the bootstrapped ARCH test. The procedure is then used to test for ARCH effects in S&P 500 returns sampled at different frequencies. In contrast to the standard and the bootstrapped ARCH tests, the new test detects ARCH effects in the transformed low-frequency returns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
