Abstract

Abstract. We perform a formal attribution study of upper- and lower-stratospheric ozone changes using observations together with simulations from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model. Historical model simulations were used to estimate the zonal-mean response patterns (“fingerprints”) to combined forcing by ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) and well-mixed greenhouse gases (GHGs), as well as to the individual forcing by each factor. Trends in the similarity between the searched-for fingerprints and homogenized observations of stratospheric ozone were compared to trends in pattern similarity between the fingerprints and the internally and naturally generated variability inferred from long control runs. This yields estimated signal-to-noise (S∕N) ratios for each of the three fingerprints (ODS, GHG, and ODS + GHG). In both the upper stratosphere (defined in this paper as 1 to 10 hPa) and lower stratosphere (40 to 100 hPa), the spatial fingerprints of the ODS + GHG and ODS-only patterns were consistently detectable not only during the era of maximum ozone depletion but also throughout the observational record (1984–2016). We also develop a fingerprint attribution method to account for forcings whose time evolutions are markedly nonlinear over the observational record. When the nonlinearity of the time evolution of the ODS and ODS + GHG signals is accounted for, we find that the S∕N ratios obtained with the stratospheric ODS and ODS + GHG fingerprints are enhanced relative to standard linear trend analysis. Use of the nonlinear signal detection method also reduces the detection time – the estimate of the date at which ODS and GHG impacts on ozone can be formally identified. Furthermore, by explicitly considering nonlinear signal evolution, the complete observational record can be used in the S∕N analysis, without applying piecewise linear regression and introducing arbitrary break points. The GHG-driven fingerprint of ozone changes was not statistically identifiable in either the upper- or lower-stratospheric SWOOSH data, irrespective of the signal detection method used. In the WACCM simulations of future climate change, the GHG signal is statistically identifiable between 2020 and 2030. Our findings demonstrate the importance of continued stratospheric ozone monitoring to improve estimates of the contributions of ODS and GHG forcing to global changes in stratospheric ozone.

Highlights

  • Climate change detection and attribution (D&A) studies seek to identify and formally quantify an anthropogenic component of change in observed climate data

  • For NAT and CTL we use the full simulations for calculating empirical orthogonal functions (EOFs) and principal component (PC), while for NAT-h we examine the ensemble mean of the individual members prior to EOF and PC estimation, and we rely on the years 1960 to 2016

  • Sphere Community Climate Model to evaluate the relative detectability of ozone changes arising from forcing by ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), greenhouse gases (GHGs), and combined changes in ODSs and GHGs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate change detection and attribution (D&A) studies seek to identify and formally quantify an anthropogenic component of change in observed climate data. We use the latitude/altitude patterns of both upper- and lower-stratospheric ozone change in response to individual and combined anthropogenic forcings to understand the relative detectability of ODS and GHG signals in observations. Rather than combining spatial pattern and time evolution information in a single vector, we use pattern correlations to assess the time evolution of the spatial similarity between time-invariant fingerprints and time sequences of (1) observed ozone patterns and (2) model-based estimates of the natural variability in ozone Such methods rely on some form of spatial covariance statistic (e.g., Santer et al, 1993, 1995) and may involve rotation of the fingerprint in a low-noise direction in order to optimize signal-to-noise ratios (Hasselmann, 1993; Hegerl et al, 1996). We examine in detail the use of these patterns for attribution of the causes of ozone changes in the upper and lower stratosphere

Model simulations and observed ozone data sets
Global mean ozone changes
Variability in WACCM natural and control simulations
Observed versus model variability
Fingerprint estimation
Signal-to-noise ratio estimates
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call