Abstract

Investigation of the influence of different ultra-low dose computed tomography (ULDCT) protocols on the detection of solid and subsolid nodules in a phantom study. A chest phantom with pulmonary nodules was scanned with different CT protocols ranging from ultra-low dose settings with spectral shaping to a standard low dose lung cancer screening protocol. Image analysis was performed with different reconstruction algorithms and dedicated computer aided detection (CAD), which was compared to manual readout. The highest sensitivity rates (83%) were achieved for the 90 mAs and 120 mAs protocols when reconstructed with ADMIRE 3 or 5 and manual readout. The only statistically significant difference was found for subsolid nodules with preference of manual readout compared to CAD (p<0.05). Dose levels for the mAs settings ranged from 0.029 to 0.2 mSv. Reliable detectability rates for solid nodules were achieved; CAD software did not prove reliable for subsolid nodules.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call