Abstract

Digital agriculture services can greatly assist growers to monitor their fields and optimize their use throughout the growing season. Thus, knowing the exact location of fields and their boundaries is a prerequisite. Unlike property boundaries, which are recorded in local council or title records, field boundaries are not historically recorded. As a result, digital services currently ask their users to manually draw their field, which is time-consuming and creates disincentives. Here, we present a generalized method, hereafter referred to as DECODE (DEtect, COnsolidate, and DElinetate), that automatically extracts accurate field boundary data from satellite imagery using deep learning based on spatial, spectral, and temporal cues. We introduce a new convolutional neural network (FracTAL ResUNet) as well as two uncertainty metrics to characterize the confidence of the field detection and field delineation processes. We finally propose a new methodology to compare and summarize field-based accuracy metrics. To demonstrate the performance and scalability of our method, we extracted fields across the Australian grains zone with a pixel-based accuracy of 0.87 and a field-based accuracy of up to 0.88 depending on the metric. We also trained a model on data from South Africa instead of Australia and found it transferred well to unseen Australian landscapes. We conclude that the accuracy, scalability and transferability of DECODE shows that large-scale field boundary extraction based on deep learning has reached operational maturity. This opens the door to new agricultural services that provide routine, near-real time field-based analytics.

Highlights

  • We introduce FracTAL ResUNet, a convolutional neural network that is largely based on ResUnet-a [19] but where the atrous Residual networks (ResNets) blocks are replaced by the more efficient FracTAL ResNet blocks

  • As object-based metrics are available for all reference fields, we introduce the concept of the Area Under the Probability of Exceedance Curve (AUPEC) to facilitate comparison between methods and provide a synoptic summary of a method’s performance

  • Optimal training was achieved after 254 epochs for the model trained on data from South Africa (MCC = 0.85) and 161 epochs for the model trained on data from Australia (MCC = 0.87)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As a result, their size and distribution can inform about agriculture mechanization [1], human development, species richness [2], resource allocation and economic planning [3,4,5]. Their size and distribution can inform about agriculture mechanization [1], human development, species richness [2], resource allocation and economic planning [3,4,5] Beyond their value as ecological and economical indicators, precise knowledge of the field distribution can help stakeholders across the agricultural sector monitor and manage crop production by enabling fieldbased analytics [6]. Digital services currently ask their users to manually draw their field, which is time-consuming and creates disincentives.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call