Abstract
IntroductionViral load is a very useful marker for monitoring patients infected with HBV and HCV. This work compares assays based on transcription-mediated amplification and on real-time PCR to verify whether they can be interchangeable. Material and methodsa bicentric study, in which 147 plasma samples from patients infected with HBV and 229 with HCV were analyzed, was carried out. Transcription-mediated amplification-based assays (Aptima® HBV Quant and Aptima® HCV Quant Dx, employing Panther system (Hologic®)) and on real-time PCR (COBAS® AmpliPrep / COBAS® TaqMan® and COBAS® 6800) were used and the degree of concordance between them was calculated. ResultsViral load was detected in both systems in 60 (40.82%) HBV samples (median log viral load: COBAS®: 2.51IU/mL (IQR 2.20-3.17), Panther: 2.71IU/mL (IQR 2.21-3.22)) and in 39 (16.96%) HCV samples (median log viral load: COBAS®: 3.93IU/mL (IQR 2.24-6.01), Panther: 3.80IU/mL (IQR 1.99-6.14)). The agreement between both systems was κ=0.943 for HBV and κ=0.925 for HCV. Comparison of viral load samples detected by both assays showed a hight correlation for HBV (R2=0.86) and for HCV (R2=0.97). ConclusionsBoth transcription-mediated amplification and on real-time PCR based assays may be interchangeable for the management of patients infected with HBV and HCV.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
