Abstract

BackgroundA barrier to the uptake of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to be the perceived high costs. A lack of detailed costing information has made it difficult for public hospitals in particular to determine whether use of the technology is justified. This study aims to provide a detailed description of the patient episode costs and the contribution of RAS specific costs for multiple specialties in the public sector.MethodsA retrospective descriptive costing review of all RAS cases undertaken at a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia from August 2016 to December 2018 was completed. This included RAS cases within benign gynaecology, cardiothoracic, colorectal and urology, with the total costs described utilizing various inpatient costing data, and RAS specific implementation, maintenance and consumable costs.ResultsOf 211 RAS patients, substantial variation was found between specialties with the overall median cost per patient being $19,269 (Interquartile range (IQR): $15,445 to $32,199). The RAS specific costs were $8828 (46%) made up of fixed costs including $4691 (24%) implementation and $2290 (12%) maintenance, both of which are volume dependent; and $1848 (10%) RAS consumable costs. This was in the context of 37% robotic theatre utilisation.ConclusionsThere is considerable variation across surgical specialties for the cost of RAS. It is important to highlight the different cost components and drivers associated with a RAS program including its dependence on volume and how it fits within funding systems in the public sector.

Highlights

  • A barrier to the uptake of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to be the perceived high costs

  • In Australia, it has been predominantly adopted by urology, gynaecology

  • In Australia, the cost of RAS has been compared to non-robotic procedures for colorectal surgery [9], prostatectomy [10] and mitral valve repair [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A barrier to the uptake of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to be the perceived high costs. This study aims to provide a detailed description of the patient episode costs and the contribution of RAS specific costs for multiple specialties in the public sector. McBride et al BMC Health Services Research (2021) 21:108 ensuring its potential is fully realized, one of the main barriers, in the public sector, continues to be the high costs associated with RAS when compared to equivalent laparoscopic or open procedures. Most of the current studies lack detailed descriptions of the cost drivers including staffing, clinical area, diagnostics or specific RAS costs including capital expenditure, ongoing system maintenance and consumables such as instruments and disposable items

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.