Abstract

This article tries to demonstrate some of the deficiencies of the Mexican legislation and certain tools of the same, particularly in the environmental area and in relation to the use of the legal instrument called Environmental Impact Statement (MIA). For this purpose, a proactive critical analysis of the application of the instrument of study in five cases of real expressive importance exercises was practiced. Some disruptions and limitations that the instrument might and has presented are submitted, as well as the role that capitalist interests and power groups can play; also the negative consequences of misapplication and bad preparation of the instrument are presented. It is concluded that there is still a clear distance that separates present Mexican legislation from the desirable environmental justice to pursue better fields and situations for sustainability linked to elements of relevant and humanized environmental education.

Highlights

  • This article tries to demonstrate some of the deficiencies of the Mexican legislation

  • still a clear distance that separates present Mexican legislation from the desirable environmental justice to pursue better fields and situations for sustainability linked to elements

  • El gobierno poblano refuerza su labor inmoral e ilegal por medio de un Decreto de declaración de “utilidad pública” para el proyecto (cuando en realidad se trata de un negocio particular entre capitalistas y gobierno siendo una autopista de alto peaje), emitido en la resaltante fecha del 31 de diciembre de 2010, cuando al gobierno poblano de entonces le quedaban apenas “unas cuantas horas de vigencia”, pero dejando “puesta la mesa” para el siguiente gobernante del estado poblano que esperaban ellos ganaría las elecciones (lo que no fue así) y completaría el “genial” negocio multimillonario en ganancias (entre el gobierno poblano y OHL hicieron público que la empresa esperaba obtener dividendos por más de 22 mil millones de pesos mexicanos con la obra), comenzando porque se le concedía a OHL por un lapso inicial de 30 años con la posibilidad de ampliarlo

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article tries to demonstrate some of the deficiencies of the Mexican legislation and certain tools of the same, in the environmental area and in relation to the use of the legal instrument called Environmental Impact Statement (MIA).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call