Abstract
This Article examines the recently decided Oil Platforms case announced by the International Court of Justice, remarking on the internal inconsistencies and problems associated with the actual holding. The ICJ's holding in this case inconsistently applies the traditional of force doctrine as applied in other cases decided by the Court, thereby providing evidence of other factors at work in the decision of the Court. Indeed, analysis of the holding, along with examination of the statements made by judges in the ICJ in several separate opinions exhibit the ICJ's desire to reprimand the United States for its current actions in Iraq and the United States' fundamental misunderstanding of proper use of force. This Article also contributes to the scholarship on the developing role of the International Court of Justice and the commentary on international tribunals playing a quasi-political role in international affairs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.