Abstract
In this paper we consider competitive performance of 73 leading Croatian companies along eight dimensions which were determined based on exploratory research (interviews with managers). We link present competitive performance with past innovation and future innovation plans. We argue that if the past innovations have given firm neither product nor process advantage over competitors, there may be no sufficient resources at present to fuel future innovation. Therefore low performers may lack strength and means to improve their position through future innovation, being stuck in a vicious cycle. In other words, for low performers their past innovation record can shape their destiny regardless of their decision to innovate. The results show that low performance is indeed related to the past innovation results. We find that bad innovators have bad competitive positions, which means less commercial success and less actual resources to be invested in the future innovations. We find those 'strugglers' in every way as ambitious about their future innovation plans as good performers, but their limited resources prove to be drag on their goals. This paper illustrates that the destiny vs. decision dilemma can be very real for some firms.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Business Performance Management
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
