Abstract

Group cohesion refers to a sense of belonging, mutual support and identification with other group members. Group cohesion has been associated with better outcomes, lower drop-out rates, more interpersonal support and better participation in psychotherapy. Nevertheless, the role of group cohesion in CBT has not yet received much attention. The rationale for delivering CBT in groups is that patients can model themselves through each other due to their similarities in symptoms. However, there has recently been a shift towards transdiagnostic CBT protocols, in which patients with varied diagnoses participate in the same groups. This shift challenges the rationale of delivering CBT in groups, and it is therefore highly important to understand if and how group cohesion develops in mixed diagnoses CBT groups. The current study used a qualitative comparative framework to investigate the patients’ experiences of group cohesion in diagnosis-specific versus transdiagnostic CBT groups. Twenty-three patients were interviewed with semi-structured interviews upon completion of the treatment. Participants had a primary diagnosis of MDD, panic disorder, agoraphobia or social anxiety disorder. A comparative thematic analysis was carried out. Three themes were found: the move from differences to similarities, the role of group cohesion in group CBT and factors helpful and hindering to group cohesion. Group cohesion developed across groups and was considered highly important in both diagnosis-specific and transdiagnostic CBT groups.

Highlights

  • Therapist alliance has been found to be an important, if not the most important, nonspecific factor in individual therapy (CBT) [1]

  • The analysis revealed three emerging main themes: the move from differences to similarities, the role of group cohesion in group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and factors helpful and hindering to group cohesion

  • The current study aimed to explore the role of group cohesion in patients’ experiences of group CBT for anxiety and depression in an MHS context

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Therapist alliance has been found to be an important, if not the most important, nonspecific factor in individual therapy (CBT) [1]. In group therapy there are multiple systems of interpersonal relationships and interactions that are far more complex than a single dyadic relationship. Previous studies have found that the non-specific therapeutic processes for individual therapy and group therapy differ [2]. Clients participating in group therapy tend to place higher importance on the relationships with fellow group members compared to the therapist/group leader [2]. Group cohesion can be understood as the we-ness of the group; the qualities that bind the members together and foster liking, warmth, comfort and a sense of belonging. Group cohesion may refer to interpersonal support, acceptance and esteem within the group [3]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call