Abstract
The objective was to analyze the implications associated with the enactment of Law No. 31592, which introduces significant amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the acquitted person's conviction. For these purposes, it was analyzed whether such legislation complies with national and international standards regarding judicial conformity, as well as to examine its feasibility and effectiveness in terms of judicial proceedings aimed at challenging acquittal convictions. A mixed methodological approach was adopted over an extended period, covering the analysis of judicial decisions issued between the period 2010 - 2022. Through a thorough analysis, it was concluded that the principle of double jeopardy should be applied exclusively to the convicted person, highlighting that challenges related to acquittal convictions should be the competence of a Criminal or Mixed Chamber belonging to a specific Judicial District, instead of being attributed to the Supreme Court. Consequently, the modification introduced by this Law is highly detrimental by virtue of the possible difficulties it could cause in the operability of the appeal processes, as well as its potential to weaken the principle of double conformity, which constitutes a fundamental pillar in the judicial system.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
