Abstract

One reason why Bayesian models based on Normal distributions are welcome in perceptual psychology is that they fit three natural expectations in the area: when two stimulus factors are in conflict the resulting perceptual value lies between the values separately supported by those factors, the resulting value is closer to that supported by the more reliable factor, and the variance implied by the combined action of the factors is no greater than the variances implied by them separately. To what degree are these good qualities shared by Bayesian models based on probability distributions other than the Normal ones? We address this problem by referring to distribution families that satisfy closure under multiplication, which is a key characteristic of prior families in Bayesian models, and by distinguishing seven desirable properties, one concerning the mean, three the variance, and three the relationship between mean and variance. The distribution families we discuss are the Bernoulli, Geometric, Gamma (including Exponential), Beta, and Pareto families. Through propositions, counterexamples, and graphical demonstrations, we show that these families vary in the degree to which they approximate the optimum performance of the Normal. We conclude by noting the relevance of our results for the Bayesian concept of information integration in psychology.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.