Abstract

To obtain an accurate hysteresis curve in large Nd–Fe–B sintered magnets at elevated temperatures, we compared the hysteresis curves obtained from the following methods: a superconducting magnet-based vibrating sample magnetometer (SCM-VSM) and the hysteresis graph (HG). Attention was paid to the values of $dJ/dH$ near $H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ and $H_{k}/H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ , where $J$ , $H$ , $H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ , and $H_{k}$ are the magnetization, the magnetic field, coercivity, and knee field, respectively. In the HG method, greater dimensional ratio ( $L/D$ ) led to easier uniform magnetization of cylindrical magnets, causing larger $L/D$ to improve $dJ/dH$ near $H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ and $H_{k}/H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ . However, the magnetization distortion did not appear at all in the SCM-VSM method at various temperatures and, thus, we could measure the values of $dJ/dH$ near $H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ and $H_{k}/H_{\mathrm {cJ}}$ as well as the hysteresis curve exactly.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call