Abstract

A systematic course design is essential in order to achieve an optimal outcome for EFL learners. I will describe the course design of vocabulary components in a Cross-Cultural Communication class in a Japanese university. This course was designed according to the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) model, in which language learners learn the target language and content at the same time, rather than learning the target language, per se. In Cross-Cultural Communication classes of the CLIL model, learners’ English vocabulary develops as well as other language skills while they increase their knowledge of Cross-Cultural Communication. Some of the problems with this approach in Japan seem to lie in the students’ insufficient English skills and their English learning backgrounds. I have attempted to design the course in order to solve these problems. I have mainly considered how to “fill the gap” between what is needed to conduct the class and what the students lack, while focusing on vocabulary development of the university students in my class. I have employed two frameworks, the Curriculum Development Process (Nation & Macalister, 2010) and the four strands (Nation, 1996), and I have adapted them to suit my teaching situation. Curriculum Development Process consists of comprehensive factors necessary for curriculum development and has allowed me to analyze my present situation. On the other hand, the four strands approach is a well-balanced principle for vocabulary learning. It is supported by Second Language Acquisition (SLA) theories and has four components: meaning-focused input, meaning-focused output, language-focused learning, and fluency development. Although the Curriculum Development Process and the four strands approach mentioned here can be effectively applied to various foreign and second language learning situations, I found it crucial to analyze my teaching situation as much as possible, and to adapt these frameworks accordingly. This paper explains how a course can be designed with partial analysis of one's present teaching situation, in hope that this could offer some guidance to those who need to develop or improve their own course based on their best analysis under limited time.Keywords: Teaching and learning vocabulary, course design, English as a Foreign Language (EFL), the four strands,, content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL)

Highlights

  • Vocabulary learning is an essential part of foreign and second language learning

  • This paper describes my insight into course design based on partial analysis according to the curriculum development framework and language teaching principles, including what I believe should be done

  • It is natural to conclude that the language curriculum development process (Nation & Macalister, 2010) and the four strands (Nation, 1996) are useful to improve our course design

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Vocabulary learning is an essential part of foreign and second language learning. In any of the four skills of listening, speaking, reading, and writing, vocabulary knowledge plays a significant role. I attempt to develop a course design for the vocabulary component in the Cross-Cultural Communication class. This paper describes my insight into course design based on partial analysis according to the curriculum development framework and language teaching principles, including what I believe should be done. I introduce a systematic way of analyzing factors, developing and improving the curriculum in a comprehensive manner in light of vocabulary development and principles of vocabulary learning supported by second language acquisition. I believe that by following these guidelines, teachers and curriculum developers could start thinking about how to improve their classes, despite the limited time they may have

A Model of Language Curriculum Design
Four Strands for Principles of Language Curriculum Development
Background of the Cross-Cultural Communication Class
ANALYSIS OF THE OUTER CIRCLES
Environmental Analysis
Situational analysis
Analysis of learners
Factor of teachers
Need Analysis
Four Strands as Principle
Balance of each of the four strands
Determined Principles Based on Analysis
Goal Settings and Adaptations of the Models
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.