Abstract

This paper presents the important features of structure-dependent model predictive control (MPC)-based approaches for automatic generation control (AGC) considering network topology. Since power systems have various generators under different topologies, it is necessary to reflect the characteristics of generators in power networks and the control system structures in order to improve the dynamic performance of AGC. Specifically, considering control system structures is very important because not only can the topological problems be reduced, but also a computing system for AGC in a bulk-power system can be realized. Based on these considerations, we propose new schemes in the proposed controller for minimizing inadvertent line flows and computational burden, which strengthen the advantages of MPC-based approach for AGC. Analysis and simulation results in the IEEE 39-bus model system show different dynamic behaviors among structure-dependent control schemes and possible improvements in computational burden via the proposed control scheme while system operators in each balancing area consider physical load reference ramp constraints among generators.

Highlights

  • Bulk power systems are usually composed of interconnected balancing areas (BAs) to minimize the operation cost from arbitrage trading and to increase the system reliability by importing electric power.In this case, each BA has its own automatic generation control (AGC) scheme in an energy management system (EMS), which is responsible for maintaining a nominal frequency and stabilizing inadvertent tie-line flows to scheduled flows

  • Each BA has its own automatic generation control (AGC) scheme in an energy management system (EMS), which is responsible for maintaining a nominal frequency and stabilizing inadvertent tie-line flows to scheduled flows

  • This paper presented an model predictive control (MPC)-based AGC considering network topology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bulk power systems are usually composed of interconnected balancing areas (BAs) to minimize the operation cost from arbitrage trading and to increase the system reliability by importing electric power. The model predictive control (MPC)-based designing process in AGC was studied extensively because of its two major advantages [2] This approach provides satisfactory control performance under dynamic constraints, such as load reference ramp constraints. Ma [9] provided an MPC-based AGC that considers generation rate constraint and load reference ramp constraint These distributed studies [6,7,8,9] assumed that the dynamic model in each area is modeled as a single-input-single-output (SISO) model, even when each BA has various local frequencies and multiple generators as the MIMO system [1].

Generator and Power Network Dynamics
Generator Dynamic Model
Generator and Network Coupling Model
Line Power Flow Model
MPC-Based AGC
Centralized MPC-Based AGC
B B u k N 1
Line Flow Control in Centralized Structure
Distributed MPC-Based AGC
Bulk-Area Partitioning for MPC-Based AGC
Illustrative Example
Centralized MPC-Based AGC Systems
Distributed MPC-based AGC Systems
Findings
Discussion on Structure-Dependent AGC Scheme
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call