Abstract

iGEM has spent the past decade encouraging teams to push their projects to the frontiers of synthetic biology. However, as project complexity increases, so too does the level of assumed risk. In the absence of a coherent international framework for evaluating these risks in synthetic biology, iGEM has recently engaged with the MIT Program on Emerging Technologies to develop a progressive approach for handling questions of safety and security. These two groups have worked together to create a rigorous screening program, acknowledging that a strengthened set of iGEM safety policies ultimately serves to expand, not contract, the universe of acceptable projects. This paper reports on the policy process evolution thus far, screening findings from the 2013 competition, and expectations for future policy evolution.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call