Abstract

BackgroundInpatient nursing documentation facilitates multi‐disciplinary team care and tracking of patient progress. In both high‐ and low‐ and middle‐income settings, it is largely paper‐based and may be used as a template for electronic medical records. However, there is limited evidence on how they have been developed.ObjectiveTo synthesise evidence on how paper‐based nursing records have been developed and implemented in inpatient settings to support documentation of nursing care.DesignA scoping review guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported using PRISMA‐ScR guidelines.Eligibility criteriaWe included studies that described the process of designing paper‐based inpatient records and excluded those focussing on electronic records. Included studies were published in English up to October 2019.Sources of evidencePubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane supplemented by free‐text searches on Google Scholar and snowballing the reference sections of included papers.Results12 studies met the eligibility criteria. We extracted data on study characteristics, the development process and outcomes related to documentation of inpatient care. Studies reviewed followed a process of problem identification, literature review, chart (re)design, piloting, implementation and evaluation but varied in their execution of each step. All studies except one reported a positive change in inpatient documentation or the adoption of charts amid various challenges.ConclusionsThe approaches used seemed to work for each of the studies but could be strengthened by following a systematic process. Human‐centred Design provides a clear process that prioritises the healthcare professional's needs and their context to deliver a usable product. Problems with the chart could be addressed during the design phase rather than during implementation, thereby promoting chart ownership and uptake since users are involved throughout the design. This will translate to better documentation of inpatient care thus facilitating better patient tracking, improved team communication and better patient outcomes.Relevance to clinical practicePaper‐based charts should be designed in a systematic and clear process that considers patient's and healthcare professional's needs contributing to improved uptake of charts and therefore better documentation.

Highlights

  • Documentation of clinical care facilitates information flow between interdisciplinary healthcare providers, supports continuity of care for patients (Keenan et al, 2008) and supports the clinician's memory of care provided (Dalianis, 2018)

  • This study aimed to synthesise evidence on how paper-based nursing records have been developed within inpatient settings to support documentation of nursing care

  • Majority of the studies were conducted in the USA (n = 5) followed by Australia (n = 3) and the United Kingdom (n = 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Documentation of clinical care facilitates information flow between interdisciplinary healthcare providers, supports continuity of care for patients (Keenan et al, 2008) and supports the clinician's memory of care provided (Dalianis, 2018). While adoption of electronic patient records is progressing, paper continues to be an important medium for recording inpatient care in many settings and in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Inpatient nursing documentation facilitates multi-disciplinary team care and tracking of patient progress. In both high- and low- and middle-income settings, it is largely paper-based and may be used as a template for electronic medical records. Objective: To synthesise evidence on how paper-based nursing records have been developed and implemented in inpatient settings to support documentation of nursing care. Eligibility criteria: We included studies that described the process of designing paperbased inpatient records and excluded those focussing on electronic records. Problems with the chart could be addressed during the design phase rather than during implementation, thereby promoting chart ownership

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call