Abstract

BackgroundThe current landscape of a rapidly aging population accompanied by multiple chronic conditions presents numerous challenges to optimally support the complex needs of this group. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have shown promise in supporting older persons to manage chronic conditions; however, there remains a dearth of evidence-informed guidance to develop such innovations.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to conduct a scoping review of current practices and recommendations for designing, implementing, and evaluating mHealth technologies to support the management of chronic conditions in community-dwelling older adults.MethodsA 5-stage scoping review methodology was used to map the relevant literature published between January 2005 and March 2015 as follows: (1) identified the research question, (2) identified relevant studies, (3) selected relevant studies for review, (4) charted data from selected literature, and (5) summarized and reported results. Electronic searches were conducted in 5 databases. In addition, hand searches of reference lists and a key journal were completed. Inclusion criteria were research and nonresearch papers focused on mHealth technologies designed for use by community-living older adults with at least one chronic condition, or health care providers or informal caregivers providing care in the home and community setting. Two reviewers independently identified articles for review and extracted data.ResultsWe identified 42 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, described innovations focused on older adults with specific chronic conditions (n=17), chronic conditions in general (n=6), or older adults in general or those receiving homecare services (n=18). Most of the mHealth solutions described were designed for use by both patients and health care providers or health care providers only. Thematic categories identified included the following: (1) practices and considerations when designing mHealth technologies; (2) factors that support/hinder feasibility, acceptability, and usability of mHealth technologies; and (3) approaches or methods for evaluating mHealth technologies.ConclusionsThere is limited yet increasing use of mHealth technologies in home health care for older adults. A user-centered, collaborative, interdisciplinary approach to enhance feasibility, acceptability, and usability of mHealth innovations is imperative. Creating teams with the required pools of expertise and insight regarding needs is critical. The cyclical, iterative process of developing mHealth innovations needs to be viewed as a whole with supportive theoretical frameworks. Many barriers to implementation and sustainability have limited the number of successful, evidence-based mHealth solutions beyond the pilot or feasibility stage. The science of implementation of mHealth technologies in home-based care for older adults and self-management of chronic conditions are important areas for further research. Additionally, changing needs as cohorts and technologies advance are important considerations. Lessons learned from the data and important implications for practice, policy, and research are discussed to inform the future development of innovations.

Highlights

  • The world population has been experiencing significant ageing―the process that results in rising proportions of older persons in the total population―since the mid-twentieth century

  • Population ageing was further advanced by the Second World Assembly on Ageing, which took place in Madrid, Spain, in 2002, and the demographic projections at that time evidenced an unmistakeable trend of continued ageing, which would no doubt consolidate during the twentyfirst century

  • Measured in U.S dollars at Purchasing Power Parity, or Purchasing Power Parities (PPP). 20 The old-age dependency ratio is the number of persons aged 65 years or over per 100 working-age persons aged 15 to 64 years

Read more

Summary

1.11. Average annual growth rate of the population age 60 years or over

Median age of the population: world and development regions, 1950, 2010, 2.10. Demographic dividend (demographically induced economic growth rates) vi. Sex ratios at ages 60 years or over, 65 years or over, and 80 years or over: 3.6. Sex ratios for the population aged 60 years or over and 80 years or over: 3.7. Proportion currently married among persons aged 60 years or over by sex: 3.8. Proportion currently married among men and women aged 60 years or over: 4.5. Old-age dependency ratio and per capita expenditure on health ($PPP): 4.8. Labour force participation of persons aged 65 years or over by major area, 4.13. Distribution of countries by statutory retirement age of men and women and vii

Executive summary
Introduction
Demographic determinants and speed of population ageing
REDUCTION IN FERTILITY AND THE SIZE OF BIRTH COHORTS
INCREASE IN LIFE EXPECTANCY
At age 80
MAGNITUDE AND SPEED OF POPULATION AGEING
More developed regions
The changing balance among age groups
DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION BY BROAD AGE GROUPS
MEDIAN AGE
DEPENDENCY RATIO
OLD-AGE SUPPORT RATIO
ECONOMIC SUPPORT RATIO
AGE COMPOSITION
SEX RATIO OF THE OLDER POPULATION
MARITAL STATUS
LIVING ARRANGEMENTS16
HEALTH OF THE OLDER POPULATION
LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION
STATUTORY RETIREMENT AGE
Economic Support systems
AGEING AND POVERTY
Conclusion
GROWTH RATE
LIFE EXPECTANCY
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call