Abstract

Here, the implications of different design strategies and measures in minimising the heating and cooling demands of a multi-storey residential building, designed to the passive house criteria in Southern Sweden are analysed under different climate change scenarios. The analyses are conducted for recent (1996–2005) and future climate periods of 2050–2059 and 2090–2099 based on the Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios, downscaled to conditions in Southern Sweden. The considered design strategies and measures encompass efficient household equipment and technical installations, bypass of ventilation heat recovery unit, solar shading of windows, window size and properties, building orientation and mechanical cooling. Results show that space heating demand reduces, while cooling demand as well as risk of overheating increases under future climate scenarios. The most important design strategies and measures are efficient household equipment and technical installations, solar shading, bypass of ventilation heat recovery unit and window U-values and g-values. Total annual final energy demand decreased by 40–51%, and overheating is avoided or significantly reduced under the considered climate scenarios when all the strategies are implemented. Overall, the total annual primary energy use for operation decreased by 42–54%. This study emphasises the importance of considering different design strategies and measures in minimising the operation energy use and potential risks of overheating in low-energy residential buildings under future climates.

Highlights

  • Greenhouse gases (GHGs) concentration in the atmosphere has increased to significant levels since the preindustrial era (IPCC Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change 2013)

  • We explore the influence of climate change on the annual energy use of a version of a multi-storey residential building in Sweden, considering different design strategies with the aim to minimise the space heating and cooling demands

  • The Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) consist of one mitigation scenario leading to very low radiative forcing level (RCP2.6), two stabilisation scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP6.0), and one scenario with very high GHG emissions (RCP8.5), each characterised by atmospheric concentration of CO2 equivalent of 450, 650, 850 and 1370 ppm by 2100, respectively (IPCC Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change 2013; IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Greenhouse gases (GHGs) concentration in the atmosphere has increased to significant levels since the preindustrial era (IPCC Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change 2013). (Karimpour et al 2015) explored climate change effects on different design options to achieve energy efficient envelopes for buildings in Australia They considered different window glazing, floor covering, wall and roof insulation thicknesses, reflective roofs and foil under current and future climates. We explore the influence of climate change on the annual energy use of a version of a multi-storey residential building in Sweden, considering different design strategies with the aim to minimise the space heating and cooling demands. The analysis is based on dynamic hour-by-hour energy balance calculations of the building version with and without the considered design strategies and under different climate scenarios to explore the impact of climate change on the building’s thermal performance.

Method
Design strategies and measures
Results
Discussion and conclusions
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call