Abstract
Selectivity is a critical issue in molecular recognition. However, design rules that underlie selectivity are often not well understood. Here, we studied five classical nuclear localization signals (NLSs) that contain the motif KRx(W/F/Y)xxAF and selectively bind to the minor site of importin α. The selectivity for the minor site is dissected by building structural models for the NLS-importin α complexes and analyzing the positive design and negative design in the NLSs. In our models, the KR residues of the motif occupy the P1’ and P2’ pockets of importin α, respectively, forming hydrogen-bonding and cation-π interactions. The aromatic residue at the P4’ position plays dual roles in the selectivity for the minor site: by forming π-stacking with W357 of importin α to reinforce the minor-site binding; and by clashing with the P5 pocket in the major binding site. The F residue at the P8’ position occupies a deep pocket, providing additional stabilization. The P7’ position sits on a saddle next to the P8’ pocket and hence requires a small residue; the A residue fulfills this requirement. The principal ideas behind these blind predictions turn out to be correct in an evaluation against subsequently available X-ray structures for the NLS-importin α complexes, but some details are incorrect. These results illustrate that the selectivity for the minor site can be achieved via a variety of design rules.
Highlights
Molecular recognition is a major theme in biology
To identify a minimum set of structural features that defines binding at either the major site or minor site, we collected from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) 42 entries that have peptides bound to importin a at either the major site, minor site, or both (Table 1)
After superimposing the importin a molecules in these entries, we found that the peptide backbones are very conserved at the P1–P5 positions of the major site and the P1’–P2’ positions of the minor site (Figure 1B,C)
Summary
Molecular recognition is a major theme in biology. The design rules underlying selectivity are often not well understood. The classical import pathway involves importin a and importin b; the former recognizes, typically via its major site, nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in cargo proteins [1]. We describe a set of design rules that explain why five NLSs selectively bind to the minor site of importin a
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.