Abstract

This paper presents a method to design active suspension controllers for a 7-Degree-of-Freedom (DOF) full-car (FC) model from controllers designed with a 2-DOF quarter-car (QC) one. A linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with 7-DOF FC model has been widely used for active suspension control. However, it is too hard to implement the LQR in real vehicles because it requires so many state variables to be precisely measured and has so many elements to be implemented in the gain matrix of the LQR. To cope with the problem, a 2-DOF QC model describing vertical motions of sprung and unsprung masses is adopted for controller design. LQR designed with the QC model has a simpler structure and much smaller number of gain elements than that designed with the FC one. In this paper, several controllers for the FC model are derived from LQR designed with the QC model. These controllers can give equivalent or better performance than that designed with the FC model in terms of ride comfort. In order to use available sensor signals instead of using full-state feedback for active suspension control, LQ static output feedback (SOF) and linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) controllers are designed with the QC model. From these controllers, observer-based controllers for the FC model are also derived. To verify the performance of the controllers for the FC model derived from LQR and LQ SOF ones designed with the QC model, frequency domain analysis is undertaken. From the analysis, it is confirmed that the controllers for the FC model derived from LQ and LQ SOF ones designed with the QC model can give equivalent performance to those designed with the FC one in terms of ride comfort.

Highlights

  • Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.The main objective in designing suspension is to improve ride comfort and road adhesion

  • To verify the performance of the controllers for the FC model derived from linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and LQ static output feedback (SOF) ones designed with the QC model, frequency domain analysis is undertaken

  • These results mean that the vertical acceleration of the passive system and LQRf1 were reduced by 39% and 20% by virtue of LQRfq, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Vertical displacement, consists of cannot four QCbe ones, a full-state feedback controller for the FCthe model can derived the roll and pitch angles of a sprung mass are too hard to be measured with commercial sensors For this reason, a state observer has been adopted for the purpose of estimating state variables of the FC model. Following the identical procedure from LQRq to LQRfq, a full-state feedback controller for the FC model is derived from LQSOFq, designed with the QC model Let this controller be denoted as LQSOFfq. The number of gain elements needed for LQSOFfq is just 2, which is borrowed from LQSOFq. LQSOFfq can give equivalent or better performance than LQRf in terms of the ride comfort.

Controller Design for Active Suspension
Controller Design with Quarter-Car Model
Design
How to Use LQR for Quarter-Car Model as a Controller for Full-Car One
Static Output Feedback Control with Quarter-Car Model
Linear Quadratic Gaussian Control with Quarter-Car Model
Frequency-Domain Analysis on Designed Controllers
Full-State Feedback Case
Static Output Feedback Case
LQG Case
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call