Abstract

As the carrier of scientific research funding for various organizations, scientific research projects are the main driving force for the development and progress of national science and technology. Performance evaluation of these projects can stimulate the vitality of scientific research, and promote scientific and technological innovation. In order to establish and improve the performance evaluation system of military scientific research projects, this paper studies the performance evaluation indicators from four perspectives: resources, effect, internal business processes, and learning and growth based on the balanced score card.

Highlights

  • Since the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, in order to realize the strategy of scientific and technological innovation-driven development, my country has continuously increased its investment in scientific research funds

  • The core idea of the balanced score card is to grasp the core of corporate strategic goals and establish an evaluation index system from the four dimensions of finance, customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth, and apply this idea to the performance evaluation of scientific research projects

  • 4 Design of performance evaluation indicators for scientific research projects based on balanced score card

Read more

Summary

The Balanced Score card

In 1990, Robert Kaplan of Harvard Business School and David Norton, director of the Nolan Norton Institute, formally proposed The Balanced Score Card theory on the basis of summarizing the management experience of many leading companies in performance[1]. The core idea of the balanced score card is to grasp the core of corporate strategic goals and establish an evaluation index system from the four dimensions of finance, customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth, and apply this idea to the performance evaluation of scientific research projects. It is to take the performance evaluation goal of scientific research project as the core, from the four perspectives of resource input, output of results, management process, and the impact of the project on individuals. 4 Design of performance evaluation indicators for scientific research projects based on balanced score card

Principles of indicator design
Resources dimension
Effect dimension
Internal business process dimensions
Learning and growth dimensions
Schedule adjustment
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call