Abstract

In engineering designed systems it is commonly considered that mathematical models, variables, and parameters are sufficiently reliable, i.e., there are no errors in modeling and estimation. However, the systems to be optimized can be sensitive to small changes in the designed variables causing significant changes in the objective function. Robust optimization is an approach for modeling optimization problems under uncertainty in which the modeler aims to find decisions that are optimal for the worst-case realization of the uncertainties within a given set of values. In this contribution, a self-adaptive heuristic optimization method, namely the Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution (SADE), is evaluated. Differently from the canonical Differential Evolution algorithm (DE), the SADE strategy is able to update the required parameters such as population size, crossover parameter, and perturbation rate, dynamically. This is done by considering a defined convergence rate on the evolution process of the algorithm in order to reduce the number of evaluations of the objective function. For illustration purposes, the SADE strategy is associated with the Mean Effective Concept (MEC) for insertion robustness, is applied to minimize forces applied in cables used for the rehabilitation of the human lower limbs by determining the positioning of motors. The results show that the methodology that was proposed (SADE+MEC) appears as an interesting strategy for the treatment of robust optimization problems.

Highlights

  • During the engineering systems design it is considered that the result is not subject to the influence of small perturbations of design variables and/or parameters involved in the process

  • For evaluating the methodology proposed (SADE+Mean Effective Concept (MEC)), some practical points regarding the application of the procedure should be emphasized: Motor coordinates in [cm] (BARBOSA, 2013): Motor 01 – [0 0 70 (x1)], Motor 02 – [0 100 70 (x2)], Motor – [40 (x3) 0 163.5]), Motor – [40 (x4) 100 163.5], Motor 05 – [100 25 (x5) 163.5] and Motor 06 – [100 75 (x6) 163.5]); For motors P1 and P2, the allowable range is between 50 cm and 150 cm

  • The stopping criterion for all the algorithms is associated to the difference between the best and the worst values of the objective function; this difference should be smaller than 10-6

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the engineering systems design it is considered that the result is not subject to the influence of small perturbations of design variables and/or parameters involved in the process. The global optimum solution can be sensitive to small perturbations of design variables vector. The concept of robust optimization should be used in order to minimize this effect in engineering systems design. This approach is applied for modeling optimization problems under uncertainty, in which the modeler aims to find decisions that are optimal for the worstcase realization of the uncertainties within a given set of values. In this context, the robustness characterizes an important tool to help getting a not very sensitive solution under certain conditions, when exposed to given conditions of uncertainty

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.