Design of a Completely New First Year Engineering Program at the University of Saskatchewan– Part III

Abstract

Aiming at improving the first-year engineering experience by engaging, inspiring, and holistically preparing students for the challenges in the future, the College of Engineering at the University of Saskatchewan redesigned and launched a RE-ENGINEERED First Year (REFY) Program. The project has had three phases, and the first two were reported at CEEA conferences in 20181 and 20192. A small-scale pilot of the competency-based assessment (CBA), one of the key features of the REFY program, was presented at CEEA 20213. In this paper, we will report the changes made to the program structure (Phase II), present the systematic procedure followed to develop the course materials (Phase III) and reflect on the first implementation of the REFY program. This paper will also discuss the proposed changes to the program for next year’s implementation.
 The REFY program consists of 10-12 modular courses with various durations and intensities each term. To better sequence materials and to facilitate just-in-time learning, the structural design of the program was further refined over the past two years via adjusting the start/end dates and contact hours of the modular courses.
 The development of course materials was directed by the identified graduate attributes (Phase I), integrated curriculum schedule (Phase II), and the philosophy of CBA. With the lessons learned from the pilot of CBA in a single first year engineering course, we defined four types of assessments and the evaluation criteria. We also developed a course preparation procedure template and created a series of policies to support the program.
 Initiating the REFY program during the COVID pandemic was a victory, although we identified some challenges and problems in Term 1 through teaching, observations, and reflection, as well as anecdotal comments. We will share the lessons learned, our opinions on the potential causes of the challenges and problems, and propose revisions for the next iteration of program refinement.