Abstract

Abstract: Two circuits have been simulated in the Optisystem 20 software. One circuit has M-QAM and the other has PAM-n. Both the circuits have been compared on the basis of Bits per symbol, signal power,Noise power, etc. The total power and noise power havebeen calculated in the electrical power meter visualizer.In both the circuits, PRBS generator is used to generate the sequence of the bits. In M-QAM,return to zero pulse generator is used and in PAM-n notreturn to zero pulse generator is used. The full width pulse is also known as NRZ (not return to zero) and halfwidth pulse is also known as RZ (return to zero). The main objective of the simulation is to get perfect Eye diagram in the Eye Diagram Anaylzer. The parametriccomparison of different types of QAM have also be doneon the basis of number of samples, sequence length, samples per bit and output power in dBm andcomparison is done by state of art. In the final result, itwill be concluded that M-QAM performs much better than the PAM-n as it is capable of transferring higher data rates. The different types of M-QAM and PAM-n eye diagrams have been plotted like 16-QAM, 64-QAMand PAM-3.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call