Abstract

VEGF plays a crucial role in cancer development, angiogenesis and progression, principally liver and breast cancer. It is vital to uncover novel chemical candidates of VEGFR inhibitors to develop more potent anti-breast and anti-liver cancer agents than the currently available candidates, sorafenib and regorafenib, that face resistance obstacles and severe side effects. Herein, nine pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives were designed, synthesized as sorafenib and regorafenib analogues and screened for their in vitro cytotoxic and growth inhibition activities against four human cancer cell lines, namely breast cancer (Michigan Cancer Foundation-7 (MCF-7), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) type (HepG2), lung carcinoma (A-549) and human colorectal carcinoma-116 (HCT-116)). Among the tested compounds, compounds 1, 2a, 4b and 7 showed the uppermost cytotoxic activities against all aforementioned cell lines with IC50 estimates varying from 6 to 50 µM, among which compound 7 showed the best inhibitory activity on all tested compounds. Stunningly, compound 7 showed the best significant inhibition of the VEGFR-2 protein expression level (72.3%) as compared to the control and even higher than that produced with sorafenib and regorafenib (70.4% and 55.6%, respectively). Modeling studies provided evidence for the possible interactions of the synthesized compounds with the key residues of the ATP binding sites on the hinge region and the “DFG out” motif of VEGFR-2 kinase. Collectively, our present study suggests that pyrazolopyrimidine derivatives are a novel class of anti-cancer drug candidates to inhibit VEGF-VEGFR function. Aspiring to promote constrained aqueous solubility, hence poor oral bioavailability of the developed lead molecule, 7 and 2a-charged D-α-tocopherol polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate (TPGS) surface-coated niosomes were successfully constructed, adopting a thin film hydration technique striving to overcome these pitfalls. A 23 full factorial design was involved in order to investigate the influence of formulation variables: type of surfactant, either Span 60 or Span 40; surfactant:cholesterol ratio (8:2 or 5:5) along with the amount of TPGS (25 mg or 50 mg) on the characteristics of the nanosystem. F2 and S2 were picked as the optimum formula for compounds 2a and 7 with desirability values of 0.907 and 0.903, respectively. In addition, a distinguished improvement was observed in the compound’s oral bioavailability and cytotoxic activity after being included in the nano-TPGS-coated niosomal system relative to the unformulated compound. The nano-TPGS-coated niosomal system increased the hepatocellular inhibitory activity four times fold of compound 7a (1.6 µM) and two-fold of 2a (3 µM) relative to the unformulated compounds (6 µM and 6.2 µM, respectively).

Highlights

  • Angiogenesis is a multifactorial process in which many factors are involved

  • Compound 7 showed the best significant inhibition of the VEGFR-2 protein expression level compared to the control and was even higher than that produced with sorafenib and regorafenib (72.3%, p < 0.001) (Tables 3 and 4 and Figures 6 and 7)

  • Compound 7 revealed an unexpected result, as it was found to offer the best vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) gene expression level along with the best significant inhibition of the VEGFR-2 protein expression level compared to the control and the utilized references

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Angiogenesis is a multifactorial process in which many factors are involved. One of the potent pro-angiogenic factors is vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), which are known as new blood vessel regulators. VEGFs interact with expressed membrane receptor kinases on numerous cell types and stimulate vascular endothelial cell proliferation, migration and the formation of blood vessels at the end [1,2]. Three main VEGF receptors are well known, which are considered to be the main factors in new vasculature and angiogenesis [2,3]. VEGF binding with their receptor results in dimerization of the receptor, phosphorylation of the kinase area, as well as stimulation of numerous major signaling pathways, and eventually, production of many physiological effects [2,3]. The key VEGF/VEGFR signal transduction effector in inducing tumor angiogenesis is VEGFR-2 [4,5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call