Abstract
There has been an intensified drive towards the ‘responsible adoption’ of automated decision-making systems. Such initiatives are questionable in that they fail to properly take into account the phenomenological complexities of human judgement. Their representational systems suffer from the frame regress limitation, thereby making them unable to match the human ability to discern cues and actions that are of ethical significance within a given moral dilemma. We argue that a socio-technical system can only meet its moral responsibilities by attributing this directly onto the human decision maker’s shoulders. Yet, prior to establishing such responsibilities, socio-technical design configurations must not thwart the human ability to expertly deliberate and judge in a meaningful and relevant manner in the first place.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
