Abstract

Stricter building regulations have resulted in the construction of buildings with a low energy use during the operation phase. It has now become increasingly important to also look at the embodied energy, because it might, over the lifespan of the building, equal the energy used for operating the building. One way to decrease the embodied energy is to reuse building materials and components or to prepare the building for deconstruction; a term called design for deconstruction (DfD). While design for deconstruction has showed environmental, social, and economic benefits, hardly any building designed and built today is designed for deconstruction. The aim of this literature review is to understand the state-of-art of design for deconstruction and how it affects the design process. In most of the literature, general construction principles are specified that promote the design for deconstruction and focus on (a) the overall building design, (b) materials and connections, (c) construction and deconstruction phase, and (d) communication, competence, and knowledge. Furthermore, the reuse potential of specific building materials is discussed, as well as the available tools for DfD. Additionally, the current barriers for DfD as specified by the literature show lack of competence, regulations, and other related elements.

Highlights

  • Buildings currently account for a significant part of the total energy use in the world; for example, in Sweden, this share is 40% [1]

  • design for deconstruction (DfD) is closely related to many research areas, for example, Life Cycle Analyses (LCA), reuse of building materials, energy use in buildings, building materials, etc. (Figure 1)

  • Extending the use of building material is considered to be beneficial from an environmental perspective, because it saves the use of virgin raw materials and embodied energy for producing these building materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Buildings currently account for a significant part of the total energy use in the world; for example, in Sweden, this share is 40% [1]. European member states have toughened requirements on the allowed energy consumption for the operation phase in new buildings. It has, become increasingly important to ensure that buildings have a low embodied energy, since it could equal the same amount of energy as the building’s operational energy use for 50 years [2]. Construction and demolition waste stands for a significant share of the total waste stream, for example, 30% in Sweden (omitting mining waste) [4]. This source of material is rarely used for reuse as building materials

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call