Abstract

BackgroundThe atomizers of electronic cigarettes (ECs) contain metals that transfer to the aerosol upon heating and may present health hazards. This study analyzed 4th-generation EC pod atomizer design features and characterized their elemental/metal composition.MethodsEleven EC pods from six brands/manufacturers were purchased at local shops and online. Pods were dissected and imaged using a Canon EOS Rebel SL2 camera. Elemental analysis and mapping of atomizer components was done using a scanning electron microscope coupled with an energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer.ResultsEC pods varied in size and design. The internal atomizer components were similar across brands except for variations occurring mainly in the wicks and filaments of some products. The filaments were either Elinvar (nickel, iron, and chromium) (36.4%), nichrome (36.4%), iron-chromium (18.2%), or nickel (9%). Thick wires present in 55% of the atomizers were mainly nickel and were joined to filaments by brazing. Wire-connector joints were Elinvar. Metal air tubes were made of Elinvar (50%), nickel, zinc, copper, and tin (37.5%), and nickel and copper (12.5%). Most of the wick components were silica, except for two pods (PHIX and Mico), which were mainly ceramic. Connectors contained gold-plated nickel, iron-chromium multiple alloys of nickel, zinc, gold, iron, and copper. Wick chambers were made of Elinvar. Outer casings were either nickel, copper-tin, or nickel-copper alloys. Magnets were nickel with minor iron, copper, and sulfur. Some frequently occurring elements were high in relative abundance in atomizer components.ConclusionsThe atomizers of pods are similar to previous generations, with the introduction of ceramic wicks and magnets in the newer generations. The elements in EC atomizers may transfer into aerosols and adversely affect health and accumulate in the environment.

Highlights

  • The external appearance, design, battery power, atomizers, and nicotine delivery of electronic cigarettes (ECs) have evolved over the last decade, with four generations recognized [1,2,3]

  • The elements in EC atomizers may transfer into aerosols and adversely affect health and accumulate in the environment

  • Low volume reservoirs were present in closed-pod systems, while higher volume reservoirs were in the refillable and open-system pods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The external appearance, design, battery power, atomizers, and nicotine delivery of electronic cigarettes (ECs) have evolved over the last decade, with four generations recognized [1,2,3]. Most first-generation or cig-a-like/cartomizer products (e.g., NJOY, V2 Cigs, BluCig, Mark Ten, and Vuse) are similar in size and resemblance to tobacco cigarettes. They contain an atomizer designed to produce an aerosol by heating e-liquids rather than burning tobacco [4,5,6]. Second-generation ECs or clearomizers (e.g., Ego C Twist) have larger atomizers/tanks with some models (e.g., Vuse) lacking solder joints, polyfil fibers, and microprocessors. This study analyzed 4th-generation EC pod atomizer design features and characterized their elemental/metal composition.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call