Abstract
In this paper a comparative evaluation of three, four-phase, switched reluctance machines (SRMs) is presented. Configurations 8/6 and 8/10 are conventional SRMs with standard relationship between number of stator and rotor poles. Configuration 8/14 has number of rotor poles calculated according to the new pole design formula introduced recently. Design considerations for novel SRM 8/14 are given. Static characteristics of SRM 8/6, SRM 8/10 and SRM 8/14 are investigated using finite element analysis (FEA). Comparison of these characteristics is given regarding several criterions for torque profiles evaluation and torque density assessment.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
