Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to develop a novel experimental nanofluid based on surfactant–nanoparticle–brine tuning, subsequently evaluate its performance in the laboratory under reservoir conditions, then upscale the design for a field trial of the nanotechnology-enhanced surfactant injection process. Two different mixtures of commercial anionic surfactants (SA and SB) were characterized by their critical micelle concentration (CMC), density, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra. Two types of commercial nanoparticles (CNA and CNB) were utilized, and they were characterized by SBET, FTIR spectra, hydrodynamic mean sizes (dp50), isoelectric points (pHIEP), and functional groups. The evaluation of both surfactant–nanoparticle systems demonstrated that the best performance was obtained with a total dissolved solid (TDS) of 0.75% with the SA surfactant and the CNA nanoparticles. A nanofluid formulation with 100 mg·L−1 of CNA provided suitable interfacial tension (IFT) values between 0.18 and 0.15 mN·m−1 for a surfactant dosage range of 750–1000 mg·L−1. Results obtained from adsorption tests indicated that the surfactant adsorption on the rock would be reduced by at least 40% under static and dynamic conditions due to nanoparticle addition. Moreover, during core flooding tests, it was observed that the recovery factor was increased by 22% for the nanofluid usage in contrast with a 17% increase with only the use of the surfactant. These results are related to the estimated capillary number of 3 × 10−5, 3 × 10−4, and 5 × 10−4 for the brine, the surfactant, and the nanofluid, respectively, as well as to the reduction in the surfactant adsorption on the rock which enhances the efficiency of the process. The field trial application was performed with the same nanofluid formulation in the two different injection patterns of a Colombian oil field and represented the first application worldwide of nanoparticles/nanofluids in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. The cumulative incremental oil production was nearly 30,035 Bbls for both injection patterns by May 19, 2020. The decline rate was estimated through an exponential model to be −0.104 month−1 before the intervention, to −0.016 month−1 after the nanofluid injection. The pilot was designed based on a production increment of 3.5%, which was successfully surpassed with this field test with an increment of 27.3%. This application is the first, worldwide, to demonstrate surfactant flooding assisted by nanotechnology in a chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) process in a low interfacial tension region.

Highlights

  • Implementation of nanotechnology for improving the performance of multiple operations within the oil and gas industry, including enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques, is currently a major research focus [1,2,3,4]

  • In chemical enhanced oil recovery (CEOR) nanoparticles could be utilized alongside different fluid formulations [7,8], as nanoparticulated systems are able to increase the sweep efficiency by improving the capillary and/or viscous forces under reservoir conditions and releasing the trapped crude oil by altering/reverting the porous media wettability [9,10,11], decreasing the interfacial tension (IFT) between the aqueous phase and the crude oil [12,13,14], and increasing the displacement fluid viscosity [15,16,17]

  • In CEOR applications it is typically used fluids formulations that produce ultra-low IFT (ULIFT) values. The maintenance of these IFT values under reservoir conditions could be challenging as the process performance could be extensively reduced due to the surfactant loss produced by its adsorption on the porous media [30,31,32,33,34]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implementation of nanotechnology for improving the performance of multiple operations within the oil and gas industry, including enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques, is currently a major research focus [1,2,3,4]. At lower IFT values, the displacement sweep efficiency is improved due to the capillary pressure reduction [25,26] and the formation of a third phase in the zone near the brine/oil interphase, which is composed of an Oil-in-Water (O/W) micro-emulsion (e.g., Winsor type III) [27]. The implementation of surfactant flooding at the low IFT region could be enough to increase the crude oil recovery under certain reservoir conditions such as oil saturation, brine composition, and capillary forces, among others [37] This increased recovery is mainly due to the low costs of the technique, which favors the application in field tests based on the surfactant loss due to the adsorption phenomena [32]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call