Abstract

The qPCR assay has become a routine technology in plant biotechnology and agricultural research. It is unlikely to be technically improved, but there are still challenges which center around minimizing the variability in results and transparency when reporting technical data in support of the conclusions of a study. There are a number of aspects of the pre- and post-assay workflow that contribute to variability of results. Here, through the study of the introduction of error in qPCR measurements at different stages of the workflow, we describe the most important causes of technical variability in a case study using blueberry. In this study, we found that the stage for which increasing the number of replicates would be the most beneficial depends on the tissue used. For example, we would recommend the use of more RT replicates when working with leaf tissue, while the use of more sampling (RNA extraction) replicates would be recommended when working with stems or fruits to obtain the most optimal results. The use of more qPCR replicates provides the least benefit as it is the most reproducible step. By knowing the distribution of error over an entire experiment and the costs at each step, we have developed a script to identify the optimal sampling plan within the limits of a given budget. These findings should help plant scientists improve the design of qPCR experiments and refine their laboratory practices in order to conduct qPCR assays in a more reliable-manner to produce more consistent and reproducible data.

Highlights

  • Since Russ Higuchi published his paper describing the use of real-time quantitative PCR (Higuchi et al, 1993), it has become one of the most popular techniques in modern molecular biology

  • This design allowed us to investigate: (1) quantitative PCR (qPCR) variability comparing the Cq ranges from 3 replicates; (2) reverse transcription (RT) variability by comparing the Cq ranges from 4 RT reactions; (3) tissue variability comparing the Cq ranges from 4 RNA samples

  • Each extract was used as template for 4 RTs, each of which was run in 3 qPCR reactions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since Russ Higuchi published his paper describing the use of real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Higuchi et al, 1993), it has become one of the most popular techniques in modern molecular biology. Two of the main issues that have caused debate in the plant research community are concerns over RNA quality assessment and data normalization based on multiple, assay-validated reference genes (Gutierrez et al, 2008a,b; Guénin et al, 2009; Die et al, 2011; Die and Román, 2012). It is astonishing how few publications have explored the reliability and reproducibility of results on the basis of the experimental design itself (Rieu and Powers, 2009)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call