Abstract

The importance of content validity in the instrument psychometric and its relevance with reliability, have made it an essential step in the instrument development. This article attempts to give an overview of the content validity process and to explain the complexity of this process by introducing an example. We carried out a methodological study conducted to examine the content validity of the patient-centered communication instrument through a two-step process (development and judgment). At the first step, domain determination, sampling (item generation) and instrument formation and at the second step, content validity ratio, content validity index and modified kappa statistic was performed. Suggestions of expert panel and item impact scores are used to examine the instrument face validity. From a set of 188 items, content validity process identified seven dimensions includes trust building (eight items), informational support (seven items), emotional support (five items), problem solving (seven items), patient activation (10 items), intimacy/friendship (six items) and spirituality strengthening (14 items). Content validity study revealed that this instrument enjoys an appropriate level of content validity. The overall content validity index of the instrument using universal agreement approach was low; however, it can be advocated with respect to the high number of content experts that makes consensus difficult and high value of the S-CVI with the average approach, which was equal to 0.93. This article illustrates acceptable quantities indices for content validity a new instrument and outlines them during design and psychometrics of patient-centered communication measuring instrument.

Highlights

  • The importance of content validity in the instrument psychometric and its relevance with reliability, have made it an essential step in the instrument development

  • Since content validity is a prerequisite for other validity, it should receive the highest priority during instrument development

  • In the one step of our research, which was performed through qualitative content analysis by semi-structured in-depth interview with ten patients with cancer, three family members and seven oncology nurses, the results led to identifying content domain within seven dimensions including trust building, intimacy or friendship, patient

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The importance of content validity in the instrument psychometric and its relevance with reliability, have made it an essential step in the instrument development. Researchers study complex constructs for which valid and reliable instruments are needed.[1] Validity, which is defined as the ability of an instrument to measure the properties of the construct under study,[2] is a vital factor in selecting or applying an instrument. It is determined as its three common forms including content, construct, and criterion-related validity.[3] Since content validity is a prerequisite for other validity, it should receive the highest priority during instrument development. Validity evidence should be obtained on each study for which an instrument is used.[4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call