Abstract
α-Glucosidase enzyme is present ubiquitously throughout the lumen of the small intestine. It is responsible for the breakdown of complex into simple carbohydrates. α-Glucosidase inhibitors such as miglitol, are drugs that have greater affinity towards this enzyme in comparison to carbohydrates. Miglitol regulates the postprandial glucose levels directly by inhibiting the enzyme reversibly and also indirectly by including the secretion of glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1). The aims of this study were (i) to design a controlled release (CR) mucoadhesive (in the intestine) formulation of miglitol which would inhibit the α-glucosidase enzyme for a longer duration of time (in comparison to the non-controlled release (IR) formulation) thus reducing the dosing frequency, and also controlling the postprandial glucose levels more effectively over a longer period of time; (ii) to assess the effect of different formulation parameters on the release of miglitol in vitro from the CR pellets; (iii) to evaluate the mucoadhesion of pellets in the intestine ex vivo; (iv) to study the effect of formulation parameters on plasma GLP-1 levels; and (v) to find out the effect of formulations on postprandial glucose levels. The data obtained was analysed to find out whether there was a correlation between these different parameters. Four controlled release formulations (CR1, CR2, CR3 and CR4) of miglitol comprising of multilayered pellets were designed successfully. The CR4 formulation containing 30% of 20 cps of ethyl cellulose (the retarding layer of the formulation) displayed slowest release of miglitol in vitro in comparison to other formulations. We designed an ex vivo experimental setup for studying the mucoadhesion of the pellets in the lumen of the intestine. Results indicated that amongst all of the adherent pellets, 5% were found to be adhering in the duodenal region, 61% in the jejunum, 32% in the ileum and 2% in the colon. Two of the controlled release formulations CR1 and CR4 were evaluated in vivo in dogs. Both the formulations displayed significantly higher and more prolonged (greater AUC) levels of GLP-1 in comparison to either the placebo or the immediate release (IR) formulations. They even displayed a significantly better control of postprandial glucose in comparison to either placebo or IR formulations. However, a comparison between the two controlled release formulations (CR1 and CR4) revealed that the plasma GLP-1 (AUC by CR1 = 63.1 ± 1.32 and CR4 = 66.2 ± 0.82) and postprandial glucose values due to both the formulations were rather similar despite their differences in in vitro release as well as pharmacokinetic profiles (plasma miglitol AUC of CR1 = 16.17 ± 4.11 and CR4 = 27.17 ± 4.33).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.