Abstract

AbstractPresented as trust technologies, blockchains, by allowing immediate secure peer-to-peer exchanges without a trusted third party, have strong disruptive potential, but raise privacy issues. We illustrate some challenges that this antagonism raises and the sociotechnical compromises made to overcome them, by analysing the design of a mobility service by a consortium of some fifteen operators, and its experimentation with the employees of these operators. The service seeks to respond to the new needs linked to the electrification of company fleets, by tracking the recharging of (personal) electric vehicles at work or (professional) vehicles at home with a view to reimbursing employees’ professional expenses by relying on a blockchain. Privacy management is a skill, based on emerging expertise, distributed across a range of professions and users, which requires compromises between different conceptions of technology and data to be guaranteed. For blockchain designers, these compromises have limited the disruptive potential of blockchain technology by recentralising data management and losing the open nature of blockchain. However, in the eyes of other designers and users, they have allowed unexpected uses and benefits to emerge, such as reinforcing the choice of blockchain technology as a “privacy solution”.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.