Abstract
Performances of active and passive rockbins are compared in Albuquerque, NM, Santa Maria, CA, and Madison, WI. The basic house is assumed to contain both Trombe wall and direct gain. The Trombe wall and direct gain are assumed to be optimally sized and controlled for each weather zone. It is demonstrated that, provided charging is done from the trombe wall, rockbins can be used to advantage in reducing the early morning auxiliary energy consumption peak common to passive houses with night setback thermostats. The paper also analyzes performance sensitivity to rockbin configuration (active, radiant slab top down charge, radiant slab bottom up charge), and to control strategies for charging and discharging. Effects of fan energy are included.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.