Abstract

In this study, a holistic energy, economic and environmental assessment was performed on a prosumer-based district heating system, including scenarios with varying district size, retrofitting stages and system configurations. A modeling framework was built which comprises a thermal network design and simulation model; a building energy demand model for districts; and supply and storage technology models that allow assessing system solar fraction, equivalent annual cost and greenhouse gas emissions of district heating systems (DHS). Furthermore, the approach allows comparing the performance of a DHS with individual heating systems (IHS) for the district with the same set of technology options (rooftop-mounted solar thermal collectors, gas boilers and thermal storage tanks). The framework was applied to a Swiss case study. The results of the case study show that DHS often outperform IHS; however, parameters such as the district size, the retrofitting stage of buildings and the system configuration have impacts on the performance of the DHS. The most important parameter lies in the adequate selection of the storage volume over solar collector area ratio, which indicates that DHS solutions are only advantageous if they are properly sized. Smaller districts and districts with retrofitted buildings especially benefit from DHS solutions in terms of energy, economic and environmental performance. Maximum solar fractions of 50% (non-retrofitted case) and 63% (retrofitted case) were reached with the DHS solutions.

Highlights

  • Of global primary energy consumption, 40% is due to buildings [1]

  • A modeling framework was developed for evaluating the design and operation of district heating systems with distributed energy sources based on their energy, economic and environmental performance

  • The results show that for all varied as the solar area ratio (VAR) scenarios, total investment costs for the individual heating systems (IHS) were higher than in district heating systems (DHS) scenarios, even for the biggest district case scenario (DHS_10)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Of residential and office buildings are still heated with fossil fuel based heating systems (e.g., oil boiler and gas boiler [2]). 11% of buildings are equipped with heat pumps [2], which is typically a cleaner solution; its environmental performance is strongly dependent on the local electricity grid mix. Another relatively clean option is the district heating system, which typically achieves higher overall system efficiency and benefits from economy of scale. The focus was put on: (1) lower temperature levels, due to the transition from mostly fossil fuel based systems with high temperature water steam to lower temperature (e.g., 70/30 ◦ C, 50/25 ◦ C) and ultra-low temperature levels (

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call